Legal Opinion

Bankard v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 23, 1871PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBartol, C. J.

The appellant, plaintiff below, claims damages in respect of four lots of cattle transported for him on the railroad of the appellee.

*201In lieu of formal pleadings the case was tried under an agreement, and statement of facts set out in the record.

After the evidence was concluded the plaintiff offered three prayers which were rejected, and the defendant one prayer which was granted; and upon application by the counsel for the plaintiff for leave to argue the case before the jury, the Court below refused such application upon the ground that there was no evidence in the cause legally sufficient,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New Jersey Steam Navigation Company v. MERCHANTS'BANK.Supreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. McCann v. Baltimore & Ohio Rail RoadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Goggin v. Kansas Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  2. Douglass v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Merchants & Miners' Transportation Co. v. EichbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  4. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. LehmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  5. Maslin v. B. & O. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1878

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API