Wright v. Loaiza
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Dissent
RICHARDS, J., pro tem., Dissenting.
I dissent.
The facts of the ease are correctly set forth in the main opinion. In our view, however, the only question in the ease is as to whether the entries made in the boobs of the plaintiff’s assignor constitute an open book account as to the defendant Dolores Loaiza.
The account sued upon has all the elements of a book account according to the definition of that term. It was entered in a book; it was a detailed statement in the nature of debit and credit, arising out of a contract; it contained the names of a creditor and debtor; so far as the defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meeker v. . ClaghornNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Byington v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Mercantile Trust Co. of S.F. v. DoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Foster v. . PerschNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Dyer v. SwiftMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.