Legal Opinion
(SS) Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 9, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01711Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 PAMELA RAE THOMAS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01711-SKO 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 11 v. COUNSEL’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT 12 ANDREW SAUL, TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) Commissioner of Social Security1, 13 (Doc. 21) Defendant. 14 _____________________________________/ 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 On October 30, 2020, Jonathan Omar Pena (“Counsel”), counsel for Plaintiff Pamela Rae 18 Thomas (“Plaintiff”), filed a motion for an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 19 (“section…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Crawford v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Hearn v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Tobias J. COTTER, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Donald G. AuenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988