Legal Opinion

Sulk v. Tumulty

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 2, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Heard on bill, answer, replication and proofs in open court.

1Opinion of the Court

Garrison, V. C.

This is a bill filed by a vendor against a vendee to compel the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. The property in question is Ho. 140 Cornelison avenue, in the city of Jersey City. There? is but a single question presented. It is admitted by all parties that the building just mentioned, and which it was the intention of the parties to sell, as it now stands, covers more land than that to which the complainant has paper title, and encroaches several inches upon the adjacent land to the north, which is in a different ownership. The complainant seeks…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morris & Essex Railroad v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hinton v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  2. DAUPHIN ISLAND, ETC. v. KuppersmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Javna v. DJ Fredricks, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Casriel v. KingNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  5. Gaub v. Nassau Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API