Legal Opinion
Naselli v. Millholland
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 2, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 3726-47PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURRAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Helen Wardman Naselli, sues as beneficiary of an alleged trust to have a successor trustee appointed, with all the rights, powers and duties set forth in an alleged trust agreement executed in 1931. The trustee died in 1938. The instrument was executed by the defendant, Alice Wardman Rheem Millholland, under seal, and provided that she irrevocably assigned, sold, transferred and delivered to the trustee, Harry Wardman, certain shares of stock, to have and to hold the same in trust. The res of the trust consisted of 13,550 ordinary shares of one pound each of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Speidel v. HenriciSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Birkett v. Columbia BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Abraham v. OrdwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John Kosty v. John L. Lewis, Trustees, United Mine Workers of America Welfare Andretirement Fund of 1950Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- McCrocklin v. FowlerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968
- Naselli v. MillhollandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Hawthorne v. WenerUnited States District Court · 1979