The Edith
District Court, W.D. Washington
In Admiralty. Suit by the Heflernan Dry Dock Company against the steamship Edith, in which the Carbon Hill Coal Company, the Turner & Pease Company, Barton & Co., E. A. Swift, and William Whiteside became interveners. On exceptions to report of commissioner.
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
On April 15, 1914, libel was filed by Heffernan Dry Dock Company, a corporation, monition issued, and steamship' Edith taken into custody by the United States marshal. Thereafter various intervening libels were filed for furnishing supplies, repairs, and other necessaries, also by the master and members of the crew for wages. The vessel was duly sold and the money paid into the registry of the court. The cause was referred to the United States commissioner, who took the testimony, reported his findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the matter is now before the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rupert CityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
- Bourdon v. The Proceeds of the GratitudeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1890
- The J. W. TuckerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1884
- The Glen IslandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1912
- Appeal of Milwaukee Dry Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Payne v. SS Tropic BreezeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Payne v. SS Tropic BreezeDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1967
- The Sophia JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1916
- Stephens v. Weyl-Zuckerman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- The Interstate No. 1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.