Legal Opinion

Arp v. Arp

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1978No. KCD29644PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Judge.

This is a marriage dissolution from which the husband appeals, claiming error in the allowance of maintenance and the division of marital property. The husband’s points of error are far from models, but, taken with the argument portion of the brief, can be considered to be claims that, as to both the maintenance and the division of property, there was a lack of substantial evidence, an erroneous declaration of law by the court concerning the award, and an erroneous application of the law by the court. The husband concedes that our review is under the dictates of Rule 73.01 and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. In Re the Marriage of PowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Conrad v. BowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Brueggemann v. BrueggemannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. In Re Marriage of VanetMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Dardick v. DardickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Hull v. HullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Calia v. CaliaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Walker v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. In Re the Marriage of FaulknerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API