Legal Opinion
Schoenmann v. de Leon (In re Whiting)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California
Decided April 28, 2004No. Bankruptcy No. 03-31927 DM; Adversary No. 03-3697 DMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DENNIS MONTALI, Bankruptcy Judge.
On March 11, 2004, this court held a hearing on the motion for partial summary judgment (“MSJ”) filed by the Trustee E. Lynn Schoenmann (“Trustee”). Defendants Kathleen M. de Leon and L. Michael de Leon (“the de Leons”) filed an opposition to the MSJ. For the reasons stated below, the court will deny the MSJ.1
I. Relevant Undisputed Facts
This case concerns a “Tenancy in Common Agreement for 320-322 Collingwood Street” (“TIC Agreement”) between Laurence E. Whiting (“Debtor”) and the de Leons.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Younie v. Gonya (In Re Younie)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Robertson v. Peters (In re Weisman)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Morris v. Kasparek (In Re Kasparek)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2010