Williams v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
Defendant Michael Williams was convict ed following jury trial of robbery, a class A felony 1. This direct appeal raises two issues:
1. failure to instruct on lesser-included offense; and,
2. sufficiency of evidence.
ISSUE I
Defendant argues that the trial court erred in refusing the following tendered instruction, which would have allowed the jury to consider a lesser-included offense:
DEFENDANT'S INSTRUCTION NO. 2
The crime of Robbery is defined as follows:
A person who knowingly or intentionally takes property from another person or from the presence of another person:
1. By using…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Case v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Richey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Tunstall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Tolbert v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Edwin FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018