Legal Opinion

Pagal v. Nickel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for "Waupaca county: Chas. JVI. Webb, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Cassoday, C. Jr

This action was commenced in justice’s court October 3, 1899, to recover the amount alleged to be due on the promissory note executed by the defendants, and in the words and figures following, to wit:

“ $100. Waupaca, Wisconsin, November 30th, 1898.
“ On or before four years after date, for value received, we promise to pay to the order of Richard Pagal, at Waupaca *472•County National Bank, Waupaca, Wisconsin, one hundred dollars, with interest at the rate o.f no per cent, per annum. This note is given as security for the payment of one hundred dollars, provided to be paid by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Herbst v. LoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Mattison v. MarksMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Wilson v. BicknellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keefer v. ValentineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Reynolds v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API