Legal Opinion

Northern MacHine Works, Inc. v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 18, 1932Published

1Opinion of the CourtCoNnoe, J.

The defendant, Julius 0. Hubbard, contends that his title to the property described in the complaint is superior to the title of the plaintiff under the conditional sales agreement or chattel’ mortgage-executed by Frank A. Carr, for the reason that he derives his title from a sale made of said property by the tax collector of the town of Wilkesboro, N. C., to enforce the lien acquired by a levy on said property prior to 3 June, 1929, for the taxes assessed against Frank A. Carr for the years 1926 and 1927. This contention is presented by defendant’s assignment of error based on his exception…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API