Legal Opinion

Woody Bros. Bakery v. Greensboro Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee, Cubiam.

The only assignment" of error on defendant’s appeal to this Court is based upon its exception to'the judgment of the Superior Court. The defendant does not assign as errors the decisions of the judge of the Superior Court of the questions of law presented to said court by its assignments of error on its appeal from the judgment of the general county court. These assignments of error were not sustained by the Superior Court. They are discussed in the brief filed in this Court by counsel for defendant. They cannot be considered, however, on this appeal. Smith v. Texas Co., 200 N.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Smith v. . Texas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Davis Bros. v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Smith v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Jenkins v. . CastelloeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Glace v. Pilot Throwing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. McCoy v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API