Legal Opinion

Hoyland v. Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 15, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

CASE 81. — ACTION BY NATIONAL BANK OF MIDDLES-BOROUGH AGAINST R. HOYLAND. — Appeal from Bell Circuit Court. Judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Wm. Rogers Clay, Commissioner

— Reversing.

Appellee, National Bank of Middlesborongli, instituted this .action against appellant, R. Hoyland, by filing’ in the Bell circuit court the following petition:

“The plaintiff, the National Bank of Middles-borough, states that it is a corporation organized under the national banking laws of the United States of America, having its banking house and place of *684business in the city of Middlesborough, B'ell county, Kentucky; that as such corporation it has the power to contract and be contracted with; to sue and to be sued and is…

2Cited by9 opinions

First Nat. Bank of Giddings v. Lee County Cotton Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
Crawford v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
Conn v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
Powers v. HardestyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
Kimbrough v. Lexington City National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.