Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Malatesta v. Hopf

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (163 AD2d 651).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Malatesta v. HopfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dutcher v. FetcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Davey v. OhlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Simpson v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Healy v. GrecoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Goode v. MeynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API