Legal Opinion

Rozgall v. Dorrance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1946No. 32035PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

This is a habeas corpus case and involves primarily the construction and validity of Chapter 81, Laws 1941, p. 322, which now appear as sections 13-101 to 13-116, inclusive, R. S. 1943.

In conformity with section 13-113, R. S. 1943, a complaint was filed in the county court of Douglas County by an unmarried woman stating on oath that petitioner, Carl W. Rozgall, made defendant therein, was the father of her child born out of wedlock. A warrant was duly issued and being thereby apprehended petitioner was brought before, the county court to answer the complaint. On April 18, 1945, in conformity…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lennox v. Housing AuthorityNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Maher v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Cowan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Campion v. GillanNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Stoppert v. NierleNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cessna v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ledwith v. Bankers Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hawk v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Belgum v. City of KimballNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Matzke v. City of SewardNebraska Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API