King v. Telesphere International, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the Court are two motions: 1) Plaintiff’s (“KING”) motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (adding a Title VII claim); 2) Defendant’s (“TELESPHERE”) motion for summary judgment on Counts I through III. King’s motion to file a second amended complaint is granted; Telesphere’s motion for summary judgment is denied. Additionally, because Telesphere contests the validity of King’s claim for relief under Title VII, the Court interprets part of Telesphere’s Reply Brief as a motion to dismiss Count IV of the second amended complaint pursuant to Fed.R.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Edith R. Suslick, of the Estate of Alvin Suslick, Deceased v. Rothschild Securities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Kathleen T. HART, Appellant, v. J. T. BAKER CHEMICAL COMPANYCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Criscione v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Scherer v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991