Legal Opinion

King v. Telesphere International, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 21, 1986No. 84 C 4653PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the Court are two motions: 1) Plaintiff’s (“KING”) motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (adding a Title VII claim); 2) Defendant’s (“TELESPHERE”) motion for summary judgment on Counts I through III. King’s motion to file a second amended complaint is granted; Telesphere’s motion for summary judgment is denied. Additionally, because Telesphere contests the validity of King’s claim for relief under Title VII, the Court interprets part of Telesphere’s Reply Brief as a motion to dismiss Count IV of the second amended complaint pursuant to Fed.R.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Edith R. Suslick, of the Estate of Alvin Suslick, Deceased v. Rothschild Securities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Kathleen T. HART, Appellant, v. J. T. BAKER CHEMICAL COMPANYCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. Criscione v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scherer v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API