Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Candisha S. Robinson

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 8, 1993No. 92-3062Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKaren LeCRAFT Henderson, Circuit Judge

I concur in the remand to reconsider whether Candisha Robinson (Robinson) acted as a “supervisor” within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(c) and to reduce the special assessment from $300 to $200 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013(a)(2)(A). I dissent because in my view this case is distinguishable from United States v. Bruce, 939 F.2d 1053 (D.C.Cir.1991), and United States v. Derr, 990 F.2d 1330 (D.C.Cir.1993), the cases upon which the majority primarily relies. Moreover, in concluding that Robinson did not “use” a firearm “in relation to” a drug trafficking crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1), the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. Timothy Wayne Morrow (89-5418/5708) and George Mooneyham (89-5710)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Richard StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Robert B. Sutton, United States of America v. Mark A. SucherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Keith D. Long, United States of America v. Sonia E. MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API