Legal Opinion · Dissent

DeLorme Publishing Co. v. International Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 12, 2015No. 2014-1572Published

1DissentTaranto, Circuit Judge

I join the majority’s determination that the Commission committed no reversible error in entering its order imposing penalties on DeLorme for violation of the patent-infringement-based Consent Order. *1337Nevertheless, I dissent from the affir-mance of the penalty order. After the penalty order was entered, indeed after DeLorme filed its opening brief in this appeal challenging the order, a district court held the relevant patent claims to be invalid, and today we affirm that invalidation in No. 20151169. The Commission has not had an opportunity to consider the effect of the invalidation. I would…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API