Legal Opinion

Ruckert v. Math Realty Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1941No. 18317PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By SKEEL, J.

The appellant instituted this action against the appellee for damages, claiming personal injuries sustained because of defendant appellee’s negligence. The appellee was the owner of an apartment house and the appellant was a tenant therein. Appellant’s petition claims that the appellee was negligent in maintaining in a dangerous condition the basement floor which was used in common by the tenants, and as a proximate cause thereof she was injured.

Appellee, The Matil Realty Company, is an Ohio corporation. Hattie Felber was designated the statutory agent of the appellee and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. McLeay v. Davison-Paxon-Stokes Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Heilemann v. ClowneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
  4. Prunkle v. DrzewieckiOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marlow v. McSweeneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Sours v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API