State v. Lamos
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
The following is a copy of the exceptions: ■— “ Indictment found by the grand jury at the last Oct. term against the defendant for presuming to be and being a common innholder, on the first day of June last, and between that day and the finding of said bill, without being licensed therefor according to law, and without being duly authorized therefor. “ Plea not guilty.
Read the full summary
The following is a copy of the exceptions: ■— “ Indictment found by the grand jury at the last Oct. term against the defendant for presuming to be and being a common innholder, on the first day of June last, and between that day and the finding of said bill, without being licensed therefor according to law, and without being duly authorized therefor. “ Plea not guilty. On the trial, it was admitted by the defendant, that he carried on the business of a common innholder as alleged. “ In defence, the defendant introduced the records of the licensing board, and by the government, it was…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was drawn up by
Tenney
—The defendant is charged in the indictment with the offence of presuming to be, and of being a common innholder between the first day of June, and the time of finding the bill at the term of the Court holden in October, 1843, without being licensed therefor according to law, and without *261being duly authorized therefor. It was admitted by the defendant, that he carried on the business of a common innholder as alleged in the indictment, and by the prosecuting officer that he was duly licensed as such for the period during which the offence was…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Kalman v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. DeBerySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- State v. De BerySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954