Legal Opinion

Clockedile v. Town of Yarmouth

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 12, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

The personal representative of the original plaintiffs, Clarence and Rhodena Clock-edile, appeals from judgments entered against the Town of Yarmouth in the Superior Court (Cumberland County). On appeal, plaintiff contends that the jury verdict assessing damages in the total amount of $300,000 was erroneously reduced to judgments totalling $60,000 against Yarmouth. At issue is the Superior Court’s treatment of a Pierringer release and an order for summary judgment entered in favor of a co-defendant, N.E. Construction Company. Yarmouth cross-appeals. We find no reversible error…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clockedile v. State Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Thurston v. 3K Kamper Ko., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Lavoie v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Margaret Austin, Etc. v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Petit v. Key Bancshares of Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API