Legal Opinion

Ahmet Boura v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 31, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00109Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION AHMET BOURA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:25-CV-109 JD COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Ahmet Boura applied for disability insurance benefits under Title II and for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, alleging that he became disabled in January 2021. His claim was rejected, leading to a review by an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”), who concluded that Plaintiff was not disabled. The Appeals Council later denied his request for review, and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Joseph A. Zurawski v. William A. Halter, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, .Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Elder v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Craft v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API