Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 8, 1978No. 27829PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carrigan

The appellant was convicted of two counts of pimping, in violation of section 18-7-206, C.R.S. 1973. On appeal, he asserts that the trial court erred in refusing to grant him a postconviction evidentiary hearing pursuant to Crim. P. 35. He also challenges the constitutionality of the pimping statute. We affirm the judgment.

I. Denial of Evidentiary Hearing.

Subsequent to his conviction, the appellant filed a motion pursuant to Crim. P. 35(b)(1)(H), 1 alleging that the pimping statute is unconstitutional. The trial court refused to grant an evidentiary hearing and rejected the appellant’s claims…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CALVARESTSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  2. People v. CzajkowskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. People v. HulseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  4. People v. StageSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  5. Hooker v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. FullerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. People v. MozeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. People v. ThatcherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. People v. MasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. People v. RickstrewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API