Legal Opinion

City of Toledo v. Voyles

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1984No. L-83-330PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

This case is before the court on appeal from the judgment of the Toledo Municipal Court wherein defendant-appellant, Robert C. Yoyles, was found guilty of violating Section 333.01(b)(1) of the Toledo Municipal Code and sentenced accordingly. This section provides in relevant part:

“(b) Physical Control. No person shall be in actual physical control of any vehicle within the Municipality if any of the following apply:
“(1) The person is under the influence of alcohol or any drug of abuse, or the combined influence of alcohol and any drug of abuse;”

Appellant appeals his conviction and sentence,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. State v. WebbArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  3. City of Cincinnati v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Key v. Town of KinseyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Kirby v. State, Department of Public SafetySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ClearyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. StarfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. State v. MacKieOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Bullock v. Dept. of Motor VehiclesNevada Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API