Legal Opinion

Clark v. Roswell Park Cancer Institute Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 17, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, the Court of Claims did not abuse its discretion in granting claimant’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5). “The court is vested with broad discretion to grant or deny [such an] application” (Wetzel Servs. Corp. v Town of Amherst, 207 AD2d 965 [1994]). Although claimant failed to offer a reasonable excuse for his failure to serve the notice of claim within the 90-day statutory period (see § 50-e [1] [a]), that failure “ ‘is not fatal where . . . *1274actual notice was had and there is no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rechenberger v. Nassau County Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Wetzel Services Corp. v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Hale v. Webster Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Kavanaugh v. Memorial Hospital & Nursing HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. LaMay v. County of OswegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API