Kathryn Rothkamm v. USA
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentPatrick E. Higginbotham, Circuit Judge
Kathryn Rothkamm claims that the IRS wrongfully levied a certificate of deposit issued solely in her name to satisfy tax liabilities of her husband. The Internal Revenue Code provides two different avenues to challenge a wrongful levy: (1) an administrative appeal; or (2) a lawsuit in federal court. By either avenue, the aggrieved party must act within nine months of the levy.1 Rothkamm did not do so. I dissent from the majority’s newly minted tolling rule. While this creativity is driven by a desire to achieve fairness, it suffers *715the vice common to such endeavors — it does the opposite by…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.