Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kathryn Rothkamm v. USA

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 21, 2015No. 14-31164Published

1DissentPatrick E. Higginbotham, Circuit Judge

Kathryn Rothkamm claims that the IRS wrongfully levied a certificate of deposit issued solely in her name to satisfy tax liabilities of her husband. The Internal Revenue Code provides two different avenues to challenge a wrongful levy: (1) an administrative appeal; or (2) a lawsuit in federal court. By either avenue, the aggrieved party must act within nine months of the levy.1 Rothkamm did not do so. I dissent from the majority’s newly minted tolling rule. While this creativity is driven by a desire to achieve fairness, it suffers *715the vice common to such endeavors — it does the opposite by…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API