Legal Opinion

Lorance Contracting Co. v. Mead (In re Woodlands Investment Associates)

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided December 20, 1988No. Bankruptcy Nos. 87-04018-3-11, 88-01353-3; Adv. No. 88-0518-3Published

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND FINAL JUDGMENT GRANTING COMPLAINT FOR RECLAMATION

DENNIS J. STEWART, Chief Judge.

This is an action in the nature of reclamation,2 brought by the plaintiffs with respect to the following items:

“144 PC % X 4 X 12 FIRECODE GYPSUM BOARD

38 PC % x 4 x 10 FIRECODE GYPSUM BOARD

12 PC % x 4Ao WATER RESISTANT GYPSUM BOARD

3 PC % x %o REGULAR GYPSUM BOARD

PC 6" x 16 25 GAUGE STUDS 10

PC 2% x 8 25 GAUGE STUDS 180

PC 3% 25 GAUGE TRACK 20

PC 3% x 10 18 GAUGE TRACK 10

PC l‘/2 x 16 18 GAUGE COLD ROLLED CHANNEL 16

PC L FLOOR RUNNER-10' 40

PC DRYWALL FURRING CHANNEL-12 60

CTN…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robert W. Matthews, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Beard & Company, Inc. v. James Talcott, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  2. Flanigan v. American Bank of Higginsville (In Re Bergsieker)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983
  3. First Coinvestors, Inc. v. CoppolaSuffolk County District Court · 1976
  4. National Plumbing Supply Corp. v. CastellanoJustice Court of Town of Ossining · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API