Legal Opinion

Bruce v. Tunstall

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 1938No. Civ. No. 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The certificate of the county clerk of the county wherein this action was tried has been submitted in support of this motion by respondents to dismiss the appeal herein for failure of appellant to file a transcript on appeal within the required time. Prom the aforementioned certificate it appears that notice of appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of respondents was filed on July 10, 1937, that no proceedings for settlement of a bill of exceptions or for the preparation of a reporter’s transcript are now pending in the trial court, the proceedings therefore initiated by appellant H. P.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Christensen v. CoueyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thrasher v. ThrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API