In Re Estate Of: J. Thomas Bernard
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
2Q|IjAUG-1* AH 9:1}-/ IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In re the Estate of No. 69608-4-1 (Consolidated with J. THOMAS BERNARD, No. 69702-1-1) Deceased. DIVISION ONE PUBLISHED FILED: August 4, 2014 Cox, J. —A court's paramount duty in construing a testamentary instrument is to give effect to the maker's intent.1 We determine that intent from the instrument as a whole.2 Similarly, "[t]he 'touchstone of contract interpretation is the parties' intent.'"3 We follow "the objective manifestation theory of contracts, imputing an intention corresponding to the reasonable meaning of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Bostain v. Food Express, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Yakima Fruit & Cold Storage Co. v. Central Heating & Plumbing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.