Legal Opinion

In Re Estate Of: J. Thomas Bernard

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 4, 2014No. 69608-4Published

1Opinion of the Court

2Q|IjAUG-1* AH 9:1}-/ IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In re the Estate of No. 69608-4-1 (Consolidated with J. THOMAS BERNARD, No. 69702-1-1) Deceased. DIVISION ONE PUBLISHED FILED: August 4, 2014 Cox, J. —A court's paramount duty in construing a testamentary instrument is to give effect to the maker's intent.1 We determine that intent from the instrument as a whole.2 Similarly, "[t]he 'touchstone of contract interpretation is the parties' intent.'"3 We follow "the objective manifestation theory of contracts, imputing an intention corresponding to the reasonable meaning of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bostain v. Food Express, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Yakima Fruit & Cold Storage Co. v. Central Heating & Plumbing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API