Legal Opinion
Bell v. New York City Housing Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The finding of nondesirability is supported by substantial evidence, including petitioner’s 2003 guilty plea to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (see Matter of Bradford v New York City Hous. Auth., 34 AD3d 463 [2006]), and the testimony of a detective that, in July 2004, while executing a search warrant of petitioner’s apartment, he saw petitioner holding a gun, and found drugs and drug paraphernalia in the apartment (see Harris v Hernandez, 30 AD3d 269 [2006]). There exists no basis to disturb the hearing officer’s findings crediting the detective’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Berenhaus v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Bradford v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Harris v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Ono v. Long Island College HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shuler v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Maldonado v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Grant v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Grant v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Greenburgh Hous. Auth. v. HallAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.