Legal Opinion

Hiller v. Perssion

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1953Published

1Opinion of the CourtBeoadfoot, J.

The sole question for determination in this case is the sufficiency of the affidavit under the provisions of sec. 326.12 (4), Stats. That section reads as follows:

“If discovery is sought, to enable the plaintiff to frame a complaint, the notice of taking the examination shall be accompanied by the affidavit of himself, his attorney or agent, stating the general nature and object of the action or proceeding; that discovery is sought to enable him to plead, and the subjects upon which information is desired; and the examination relative thereto shall be permitted unless the court or presiding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Stott v. MarkleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API