Legal Opinion
Pfeifer v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 10, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition challenging respondent’s determination, upon the recommendation of the Time Allowance Committee (TAC), to withhold 13 months of petitioner’s good behavior allowance. “It is settled that any decision affecting good time allowances shall not be reviewed so long as it is made in accordance with the law (see, Correction Law § 803 [4])”. (Matter of Staples v Goord, 263 AD2d 943, 944, lv denied 94 NY2d 755, rearg denied 94 NY2d 900; see, Matter of Urbina v McGinnis, 270 AD2d 535; People ex rel.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Staples v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People ex rel. Jelich v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Ferry v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Pelaez v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Urbina v. McGinnisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kevilly v. ConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Matter of Gamboa v. MartuscelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
- People ex rel. Thomas v. MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002