Legal Opinion

Davison Chemical Corp. v. The Henry W. Card

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 28, 1944No. 284PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The barge Tenas was in tow of the tug Card and was so negligently navigated by the tug that she was stranded and damage was suffered both by the barge and her cargo. There is no dispute that the stranding was due to errors of navigation. But the claimant-appellee, the owner of the tug, argues, and as we think properly, that it is relieved from liability for any damage to the barge due to the stranding because of Clause Tenth of the charterparty, which reads as follows:

“Tenth: Acts of God, enemies, fire, restraints of Princes, rulers and peoples, strikes, riots…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The VolundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  2. Clyde Commercial S. S. Co. v. West India S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  3. Luckenbach v. Insular LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
  4. The Vale RoyalDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1943
  5. Interports Transp. Corp. v. Maine Seaboard Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. Dixie Carriers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
  2. Delaware River Terminals, Inc. v. M/S AncoraDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API