Legal Opinion

Tate v. Atlanta Oak Flooring Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 2, 1942No. Record No. 2498PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrowning, J.

*367A. E. Tate, trading as A. E. Tate Lumber Company, sued the Atlanta Oak Flooring Company, claiming the sum of $330.00 alleged to be due it for the failure of the defendant to perform its contract with the plaintiff.

It was proven that A. E. Tate was the sole owner of the company bearing his name. The principal ground of defense, and the one with which we are alone concerned, is that the plaintiff operates under a trade name and, having failed to comply with the requirements of section 4722(1) of the Code of Virginia, it was operating in violation of law, and therefore any contract made by it is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Colbert v. Ashland Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  2. Kusnetsky v. Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  3. Merrill v. Caro Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bain v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  2. Phlegar v. Virginia Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  3. Matthews v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  4. Minor v. Gal-Tenn Corp.Scott County Circuit Court · 1998
  5. Precision Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Vinales (In Re Vinales)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API