Legal Opinion

People v. Gill

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 3, 2018No. Appeal 3–15–0594UnpublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

¶ 1 Defendant, Steve W. Gill, appeals following his conviction for aggravated arson. He argues on appeal that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Defendant also argues that the circuit court erred in failing to suppress certain pieces of evidence at trial. Further, defendant urges that he was denied a fair trial. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

¶ 2 FACTS

¶ 3 The State charged defendant by indictment on September 25, 2014, with aggravated arson ( 720 ILCS 5/20-1.1(a)(1) (West 2012) ) and…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. LindseyIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
  2. People v. HortonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  3. People v. CliftonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  4. People v. McGheeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  5. People v. PearsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API