Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McKenna v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 28, 1934Published

1ConcurrenceDavis, J.

(concurring specially). — I realize quite well that in this State the rule has been handed down without qualification from judge to judge, year after year, to the general effect that no judgment will be reversed in this Court because of the failure of a trial judge to give a particular charge to the jury, unless the substance of the charge omitted was specifically requested to be given, was refused, and proper exception taken to such refusal at the time thereof.

But this rule, like many other rules that we .have ofttimes “parroted” without qualification, is subject to the limitation of that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hoodless v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. O'Steen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. Demeter Land Co. v. Florida Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Parker v. DekleSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  5. Gober v. Braddock, Jr.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API