Legal Opinion

Wile v. Butler

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Chaffee County.

1Opinion of the CourtThomson, J.

Butler Bros., appellees, brought suit against Hecht& Co., *155and attached a stock of goods in possession of the latter firm. The appellants, Wile Bros. & Co., intervened, claiming the goods by virtue of a chattel mortgage before that time given by Hecht & Co. to the intervenors, to secure a debt owing by Hecht & Co. to them. The mortgage covered the goods which were attached, and provided that the mortgagors might sell the mortgaged property, and that they should, after deducting the expenses of sale, pay the proceeds at once to the mortgagees, retaining nothing for themselves.…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. The Exchange National Bank of Colorado Springs v. Raymond Hough, as TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  2. Roberts v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Sharp v. HollisterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  4. Estes v. First National BankColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Estes v. First National BankColorado Court of Appeals · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API