Legal Opinion

Stolte v. Karren

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1916No. 5817Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

It is contended by counsel for appellees in the motion for rehearing, supported by an elaborate written argument, that the former opinion in the instant case is error because the facts alleged by appellant are insufficient to entitle her to an injunction. The contention is founded upon the mistaken idea that the power to grant an injunction in this case is limited by the rule established in Texas prior to the adoption in 1909 of the amended article 4643. The law announced by those old cases is. thus clearly expressed in the case of Mann v. Wallis, Landes & Co., 75 Tex.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gardner v. DouglassTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Van Ratcliff v. CallTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Mann v. Wallis, Landes & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1890
  4. Purinton v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Spencer v. RosenthallTexas Supreme Court · 1882

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API