Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Cliett

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 11, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

This was a suit in the lower court to rescind a contract for the purchase of certain real estate and to require the defendants in this court below to return to the complainant a certain sum of money paid on the contract. It is needless to consider any part of the record except that part which is involved in the demurrer to the bill of complaint.

The following allegations appear in the bill:

That the said defendant proposed to your orator to sell and convey to orator the aforesaid described lands upon certain terms and conditions, to-wit: that orator was to pay to the said defendant the sum of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deans v. WilcoxonSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  2. McClinton v. ChapinSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. West v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flewwellin v. JeterSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  2. Connelly v. Cama Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API