Legal Opinion

Belinsky v. Twentieth Restaurant, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 25, 1962PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROAKE, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Plaintiff claims damages for physical injuries allegedly resulting from eating- particles of glass which were embedded in food eaten by plaintiff in defendant’s restaurant.

Plaintiff contends that there is no genuine issue of fact concerning the allegation that he ate food in defendant’s restaurant which contained glass and that, pursuant to New York law, defendant is liable to him under a theory of implied warranty for any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Temple v. . KeelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Patricia Ann Lundeen, General Guardian of Persons and Estates of Maureen Joan Cordner and Michael Joseph Cordner v. France Jeanne CordnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  2. Fraser v. Doubleday & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. Lucy Blynn Marsden and Jack Marsden v. Sebastiano O. PataneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Rinieri v. ScanlonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  5. Hurley v. Northwest Publications, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API