Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 5, 1900No. 11,598PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court; D. M. Dale, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J. :

This was a proceeding in quo warranto, brought by the state on the relation of the county attorney, for the purpose of ousting plaintiff in errOx, D. A. Mitchell, from the office of police judge of the city of Wichita. For several years prior to July 1, 1898, the police department of that city was controlled and managed by police commissioners. On that date the governor abolished the police commission and D. A. Mitchell was appointed by the mayor, and confirmed by the city council, as police judge. *780He qualified, entered upon the discharge of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. StudtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Bagwell v. Town of LawrencevilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. State v. MenkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arredondo v. Duckwall Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Baker v. Agricultural Land Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  3. Emmert v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. City of Topeka v. McCabeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Acme Foundry & Machine Co. v. WamplerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API