Legal Opinion

State v. Biscoe

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1975No. 3088PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

Paul Melvin Biscoe, the appellant, was found guilty by a jury of robbery in violation of A.R.S. § 13-641, § 13-653. Immediately after the verdict, the issue of Biscoe’s alleged prior conviction for lewd and lascivious acts was tried to the jury which found that the appellant had been convicted of that charge. He now appeals, contending that the proof of the prior conviction was insufficient as a matter of law.

On this issue, the state offered into evidence a certified copy of a minute entry of an order of a judge of the Superior Court of Maricopa County finding Paul Melvin Biscoe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SettleArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. RossArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. La Mar v. La MarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. NashArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. SamonteHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. TresizeArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API