Lind v. Lambert

Respondent sold two automobiles to the Paysee Investment 'Company. The first was paid for but the second was not. Thereafter respondent sued the Paysee Investment Company for the purchase price of the second ear and levied attachment on the first. The car was later sold to satisfy the attachment.

Appellant intervened and claimed the car levied upon as his. The jury returned a verdict in favor of respondent and against appellant. The court thereupon entered judgment for respondent against the Paysee Investment Company and dismissed the complaint of intervention. There after on the hearing of…