Barnett v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.
I. Introduction
Gary Michael Barnett appeals from his conviction by a jury for the offenses of indecency with a child and aggravated sexual assault of a child. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11 (Vernon 2003), § 22.021 (Vernon Supp.2004-05). In his first point, appellant argues that the trial court erred by conversing with the jurors during polling about their propensity to change their verdicts. In his second point, appellant argues that the trial court erred by over*131ruling his motion to quash the indictment. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
II.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Ocon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Rosales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Nancy Willis Benefield v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
- Brad Lyle Bokemeyer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- in Re: The Commitment of Gregory A. Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2019
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.