Legal Opinion

State v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 1, 1931No. 20654PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and order of the district court of Delaware county, setting aside a judgment theretofore entered in said court in an action wherein plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs an.d the city of Tulsa was defendant, granting the plaintiffs a permanent injunction, enjoining the city of Tulsa, its agents and employees from creating and maintaining a wire screen in and across the channel of Spavinaw creek so as to prevent the free passage of fish up and down such stream.

The parties will he referred to as in the trial court.

The plaintiffs, the state of Oklahoma, Delaware…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hines v. BaconSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Smith Premier Typewriter Co. v. WestcottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Kentucky Bonding Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Koch v. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jent v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. McFadden v. Mid-States Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  3. Mobbs v. City of LehighCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Babb v. National Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API