Legal Opinion

Truman v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 7, 1933No. 38843PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, District Judge.

The facts in this case are correctly stated by the plaintiff in his brief, as follows:

“1. Taxpayer is a member of the partnership of Barnett & Truman, engaged in the practice of law since 1916, composed of himself and Otto R. Barnett.
“2. Taxpayer has always maintained his books and made his returns on a cash receipts basis and accordingly for the years 1923 and 1924 filed income tax returns on that basis, the correctness of the figures being undisputed, showing that portion of his income derived from the partnership to be as follows:

1923

Distributive share of net income…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Estate of EnrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Resnik v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  3. Scherf v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  4. Acker v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Basye v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API