Davis v. State

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

A jury convicted the appellant, Joe Nathan Davis, of possession of heroin weighing less than 28 grams, found the two enhancement allegations to be true, and assessed his punishment at confinement for life. We affirm.

1. Point of error one

In point of error one, the appellant argues that the trial court erred “in allowing the prosecutor, over objection, to remove a judgment and sentence from a penitentiary packet and replace it with a judg ment and sentence which had not been attested to.”

During the punishment stage of the trial, the prosecutor introduced a penitentiary…