Legal Opinion

Alphonse Kanton, Movant-Appellant v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 21, 1965No. 14860_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.

Alphonse Kanton, movant, has appealed from the denial by the district court of his motion under 18 U.S.C.A. rule 35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to correct that part of his sentence which he claims is illegal. He points out that the indictment upon which he was convicted charged him with two bank robberies in separate counts, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. section 2113, but that in charging these violations no subsections of section 2113 were mentioned. He was convicted on the first count; the second was dismissed on motion of the government.

Prior to filing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. Roy Rudolph Drake, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  3. United States v. Alphonse KantonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  4. George Colquette v. United States of America, Clarence Manns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  5. United States v. Leonard GarfinkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Ralph George CiongoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  2. United States v. Alphonse KantonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  3. Alphonse Kanton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API