Legal Opinion

Rosenbloom v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 25, 1957No. 451Published

1Opinion of the Court

355 U.S. 80 (1957)

ROSENBLOOM

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 451.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 25, 1957.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice and Joseph F. Goetten for the United States.

2Per curiam

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The Court of Appeals has held, without opinion, that petitioner's notice of appeal from the District Court, filed on July 8, 1957, was untimely. The Government has conceded that the Clerk of the District Court did not mail…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Huff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Rosenbloom v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  4. Diego Gonzalez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
  5. Gonzalez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API