Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RONALD B. LEIGHTON, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendanb-Interveners’ Motion to Compel *575Discovery Responses from Plaintiffs Mesler and Thelen [Dkt. # 161] and upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order [Dkt. # 164]. The Court has reviewed the materials filed for and against each motion and is fully advised about the factual and legal issues involved. Oral argument is not necessary for deciding the issues before the Court. Defendant-Interveners, apparently recognizing that Plaintiffs do not oppose the discovery requests, have filed a Motion to Withdraw Motion to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Glenmede Trust Company Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz v. B. Ray Thompson, Jr. Juanne J. Thompson Catherine v. Thompson Adella S. Thompson B. Ray Thompson, III Sarah Thompson Tarver Rebekah L. Thompson B. Ray Thompson, Jr., as Trustee of Five Thompson Family Trusts Juanne J. Thompson, as Trustee of Five Thompson Family Trusts Dale A. Keasling, as Trustee of Five Thompson Family Trusts v. The Honorable Herbert J. Hutton, United States District Judge, NominalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Rivera v. NIBCO, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- R.C.O. Reforesting v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sundby v. Marquee Funding Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020